GFL took ownership of Arbor Hills Landfill on October 30, 2020, per their regulatory submission to EGLE (Nov 4, 2020, SRN N2688, signed by David Seegert).

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is the gas that gives landfill emissions their rotten-egg smell, and a recognized respiratory irritant at higher concentrations. Two kinds of measurement in the public record describe it at Arbor Hills: what actually reached the air at the property boundary, and how strong the source is in the gas inside the wells. This page puts each one next to what its level means for health. Every figure is the operator's own EGLE filing or the fence-line and school monitors, unaltered.

The one distinction that matters here. Ambient readings, in parts per billion (ppb) at the fence line and the school, are the concentrations that reach where people are; health and odor thresholds apply to these. In-gas readings, in parts per million (ppm, where 1 ppm equals 1,000 ppb) at the wellhead, describe the strength of the source before the gas is captured and piped to the flares and the energy plant; they are a confined-space hazard, not what residents breathe. The two tables below are kept on those separate footings.

What reached the air: the fence line

The site's perimeter network is a ring of six stations (MS-1 through MS-6) along the property boundary. Between May 2022 and mid-2025 it recorded 56 hourly readings above 30 ppb, in 25 distinct episodes. The most significant are below, with what each level means for health. No episode appears in the record after mid-2025, for two reasons noted under the table.

Date (ET)StationPeak (ppb)How longWhat the level means for health
2022-12-085 of 6 stations78same hour, site-wide2.6x the 30 ppb acute health reference level (the fence-line action level)
2023-01-07MS-187single hour2.9x the reference level
2023-09-22MS-279single hour2.6x the reference level
2023-10-05 to 06MS-2155~10 hours5.2x the reference level
2024-02-22MS-2146~19 hours4.9x the reference level
2025-01-22MS-3110~3 hours3.7x the reference level
2025-05-13MS-3135~2 hours4.5x the reference level
2025-06-18*MS-3327single hour10.9x the reference level; the highest on record

Each bar is scaled to the record reading (327 ppb), with the tick at the 30 ppb action level.

* No episode above 30 ppb appears in the record after mid-2025, for two reasons. The four stations still reporting (MS-1, MS-3, MS-4, MS-6) have recorded nothing above 30 ppb since then, with 2026 peaks below 23 ppb. At the same time, the other two stations, including MS-2 (historically the station with the most hydrogen-sulfide exceedances), stopped producing valid data, so the quiet is genuine at the working stations but not verified where exceedances were most likely (details below).

Reference points and sources. The 30 ppb level is the fence-line (perimeter) action level in the site's consent judgment, and equals the OEHHA 1-hour acute health reference level; it is a 15-minute rolling standard, so these hourly readings are a reasonable short-term approximation to it, though the raw 15-minute feed would be needed for an exact count. Odor detection begins around 5 to 20 ppb. A separate 24-hour ambient screening level (72 ppb, the EGLE Air Toxics value, also the school monitor's 24-hour action level) uses a longer averaging time, so a single hour above it is not by itself a 24-hour exceedance. The 750 ppb acute-discomfort level (EPA AEGL-1), the monitor's 15-minute precautionary tier, was never reached at the fence line. Studies of people living next to municipal landfills link ambient hydrogen sulfide to health effects: Heaney et al. (2011) associated low-parts-per-billion hydrogen sulfide with odor complaints and self-reported symptoms, and Mataloni et al. (2016) linked modeled landfill hydrogen sulfide exposure to elevated respiratory mortality and hospitalization in a 242,000-person cohort. These fence-line episodes reached levels well above the exposures in the Heaney study.

How strong the source is: in the gas at the wells

In April 2026 the operator surveyed hydrogen sulfide well by well and filed the results with EGLE. Of the 506 wells surveyed, 261 carried gas at or above 76 ppm and 91 were at or above 500 ppm. The strongest are below; the six shown are Drager-tube reads at the tube's range limit, so their true values are at or above the figures listed. These are concentrations inside the extracted gas, so the health column describes the hazard of that raw gas, not resident exposure.

WellH2S in gas (ppm)What the raw gas is
AHWWTS01 (leachate sump)≥30,000The instrument's ceiling; raw gas far past every acute-hazard level
AHW250R3≥10,000~100x the 100 ppm IDLH (immediately dangerous to life)
AHW265R3, AHW235R4, second sump≥5,000 each~50x the IDLH (AHW265R3 is an EGLE-flagged odor-risk well)
AHWW402R≥2,000~20x the IDLH
91 of 506 wells≥500Five times the IDLH or more
261 of 506 wells≥76Above the level considered immediately dangerous if breathed

Across all 506 surveyed wells, hydrogen sulfide in the gas spreads like this:

0 ppm (117)   under 76 ppm (128)   76 to 500 ppm (170)   500 ppm or more (91). The median well reads 80 ppm, just above the 76 ppm level considered dangerous if breathed, and 261 of the 506 wells (52%) are at or above it.

These are the strength of the source, not the air anyone breathes. The gas is captured and piped to the flares and the gas-to-energy plant, and the wellheads are tested as confined-space hazards for exactly this reason. What reaches residents is the fence-line ambient figure in the first table, in ppb. Elevated hydrogen sulfide here also predates GFL: EGLE inspectors in 2019, under the prior owner, recorded up to 23 ppm at gas holes with a handheld meter.

A map of the Arbor Hills well field with each well plotted by location and colored by its hydrogen-sulfide reading; the strongest sources cluster in the interior. Gray squares mark the June 16, 2026 surface-methane exceedances.
Each surveyed well by location and hydrogen-sulfide source strength (in-gas ppm, log scale). The strongest sources sit across the interior of the well field. Gray squares mark the June 16, 2026 surface-methane exceedances, a separate surface measurement shown for context. Click to enlarge. Operator EGLE filings, SRN N2688: April 2026 wellhead H₂S survey

Heat and hydrogen sulfide, in the same wells

Arbor Hills has a documented elevated-temperature problem, tracked on this site's thermal map and wellfield explorer and visible in the 2022 subsurface event. In the operator's April survey, the two problems show up in the same wells: the hotter a well, the more hydrogen sulfide its gas tends to carry.

A scatter plot of wellhead hydrogen sulfide on a log scale against wellhead temperature, showing hydrogen sulfide rising as temperature increases across 505 wells.
The same wells' hydrogen sulfide against wellhead temperature on the survey day, a Spearman rank correlation of 0.60 across the 505 wells with both a surveyed H2S value and a same-day temperature (the survey covered 506). Click to enlarge. Operator EGLE filings, SRN N2688: April 2026 wellhead H₂S survey + wellfield temperature

This is an association in the operator's own data, a rank correlation of 0.60, not a proven cause. As far as we can find, no study has directly tested whether higher landfill temperature drives more hydrogen sulfide, so this is best read as a real but unexplained pattern, one worth putting in front of EGLE and the operator rather than a settled mechanism. It is not simply an artifact of a few unusual wells, a point checked by well type.1 And these are in-gas source readings, not resident exposure.

The fuller picture

The school next door has stayed clean. Ridge Wood Elementary, the most sensitive receptor near the landfill, has the longest clean record on the site. Under an EPA agreement, a monitor at the school has reported a value every month for 68 consecutive months, December 2020 through July 2026, and every one is below 1 ppb. This is a different instrument from the fence-line stations, a 24-hour sampler that reports down to a 1 ppb floor, so a reading below 1 ppb is a genuine low value rather than a frozen zero of the kind described next. On the 24-hour-average basis that monitor uses, the school has never approached the 72 ppb screening level.

But the recent fence-line quiet is not verified. The perimeter network has logged no exceedances since mid-2025, yet two of its six stations stopped producing valid hydrogen-sulfide readings around the same time. MS-2 and MS-5 have reported a flat 0.0 ppb since mid-2025, while their methane sensors and the other four stations keep varying normally. A working sensor produces small, fluctuating values, not an unbroken run of exact zeros, so this points to a non-responsive sensor rather than clean air. MS-2 is historically the station with the most hydrogen-sulfide exceedances of the six, so the recent absence of readings there cannot be read as compliance. The source is GFL's own public perimeter feed (Barr Engineering).

1 The obvious question is whether the correlation is just a well-type effect, since leachate wells run both hot and high in hydrogen sulfide. It is not. Overall Spearman rank correlation 0.60 (505 wells); within the vertical gas wells alone 0.58 (295 wells); excluding every leachate, sump, and riser well 0.59 (only 6 wells excluded); controlling for well type across all categories, a moderate 0.35 remains. Computed from the operator's filed April 2026 survey and wellfield temperatures (in the data releases below). On the science: the abiotic elevated-temperature reaction pathway described in the landfill literature tracks other gases, not hydrogen sulfide, and we could not find a study that directly tests temperature against in-gas hydrogen sulfide, so this is an untested question, not a resolved one. Return.